Review Scout Evidence and Record Decisions
Scout brings source records, samples, model versions, business requirements and human confirmation into one task. Reviewers use the current scope to decide what each item supports and what still requires verification.
Review Inputs and Evidence
| Evidence | It can support | Also verify |
|---|---|---|
| Field name or AI suggestion | A candidate meaning and investigation direction | Equipment, unit, location and field definition |
| Authorized manual or field record | Equipment definition, installation or field meaning | Current source connection and readings |
| Returned sample | A value existed during the sampled interval | Historical coverage, continuity and freshness |
| Accepted proposal | A human-reviewed content decision | Validation, application and publication status |
| Release receipt | The stated version or association was applied | Source readings and business-application result |
| Historical interval definition | The intended time range | Actual coverage and gaps |
Confirm Equipment and Field Meaning
MDM identity establishes the real-world object. Brick classes describe the equipment or point type. Review the current master-data identity, equipment attributes and source records together.
New equipment commonly needs:
- asset identifier, serial number and installation location
- sensor orientation and measurement position
- acceleration, velocity, displacement or another measured quantity
- RMS, peak, sampling rate and scaling rules
- temperature-point and battery-field definitions
- unit, timezone and event time
A useful decision reason cites the evidence directly, for example: “The commissioning record identifies this device and defines channel Z as axial vibration velocity RMS; the selected source uses the same device tag and unit.”
Identify Source and Data-Processing Scope
Label customer, demonstration and engineering-test sources accurately and record the observation time. Before sending data to an external model service, confirm the permitted fields, samples and documents under the customer's data-processing policy.
Store credentials in protected configuration. Task notes and evidence references should retain only the business context and traceable source location required for review.
Record the Decision Lifecycle
- Review supporting evidence, conflicting evidence and open questions.
- Record confirmation, rejection or an evidence request with a reason.
- Apply an approved model proposal to a draft, or prepare a dataset release plan.
- Run validation or a dry run against the current version.
- Have the approver approve the release plan.
- Have the release operator apply it and verify the result.
When the source, model or binding version changes, validate the new version and obtain the corresponding approval. Earlier decisions remain available in the task history.
Handle Missing or Blocked Evidence
| State | Meaning | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Missing or unknown | Available evidence cannot yet answer the question | Assign an owner and required evidence |
| Partial | Only part of the requirement or time range is covered | Record covered and uncovered scope |
| Stale | The evidence version or observation time is outside the project requirement | Obtain the current version or a new observation |
| Unavailable | A required source or dependency cannot currently be accessed | Record the cause and assign the responsible owner |
| Zero | A valid observation returned zero | Retain the value, unit and observation time |
| Truncated list | The current view contains only part of the result | Narrow the scope or continue through the result pages |
Preserve a Usable Handover Record
A complete record contains the task scope, source and time boundary, equipment identity, field definitions, decision reason, approver and operator, effective version, actual observation result, and remaining questions with owners.